Campaign Setting Design: Definitions

This article is a follow-up to my earlier Campaign Setting Design article. It expands somewhat on the idea of entities (there called ‘features’; I have formalized the structures somewhat).

I will be providing some greater description of the techniques I use to develop settings and scenarios. In order to do that clearly, I need to provide some definitions. There are other terms that will come up later, but these ones will be common to all articles in this series.

  • Entities are any story elements significant enough to document, but not purely mechanical elements.
  • Scope Levels define and limit how ‘big’ an entity is. An entity with encounter scope (the bandits mentioned below) is unlikely to have impact on the setting as a whole, while an entity with setting scope (such as a god) clearly can.

Edit 2014/04/05: The definitions previously posted below have been updated and expanded in new posts. Normally I might simply update the definitions, or redirect this page to the new definitions, but because I have split the content of this page into two that obviously won’t work.

7 Comments

  1. On relationships for scenario design: there are really only three “meaningful” (that is, story-driving) relationships between people: blood, sex, and money. They create and drive the emotional core of a scenario in ways other relationships (say political or group memberships or friends) don’t.

  2. Pingback: Links of the Week: January 23, 2012 | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

  3. Pingback: Fantastic Creations: Devising Fantastic Creations | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

  4. Pingback: Teratic Tome Takeaways | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

  5. Pingback: Books and Other Sources of Knowledge | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

  6. Pingback: Fractal Game Design | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

  7. Pingback: Path Extensions: Transitions in Node-Based Design | Keith Davies — In My Campaign - Keith's thoughts on RPG design and play.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to Top