Campaign Setting Design: Definitions

This article is a follow-up to my earlier Campaign Setting Design article. It expands somewhat on the idea of entities (there called ‘features’; I have formalized the structures somewhat).

I will be providing some greater description of the techniques I use to develop settings and scenarios. In order to do that clearly, I need to provide some definitions. There are other terms that will come up later, but these ones will be common to all articles in this series.

  • Entities are any story elements significant enough to document, but not purely mechanical elements.
  • Scope Levels define and limit how ‘big’ an entity is. An entity with encounter scope (the bandits mentioned below) is unlikely to have impact on the setting as a whole, while an entity with setting scope (such as a god) clearly can.

Edit 2014/04/05: The definitions previously posted below have been updated and expanded in new posts. Normally I might simply update the definitions, or redirect this page to the new definitions, but because I have split the content of this page into two that obviously won’t work.

1 Comment to "Campaign Setting Design: Definitions"

  1. April 25, 2011 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

    On relationships for scenario design: there are really only three “meaningful” (that is, story-driving) relationships between people: blood, sex, and money. They create and drive the emotional core of a scenario in ways other relationships (say political or group memberships or friends) don’t.

Leave a Reply

6 Trackbacks to "Campaign Setting Design: Definitions"

  1. on January 23, 2012 at 7:37 am
  2. on May 17, 2012 at 10:32 pm
  3. on January 29, 2013 at 10:18 pm
  4. on April 2, 2013 at 11:53 pm
  5. on April 7, 2013 at 11:15 pm
  6. on April 17, 2013 at 10:03 pm