To do with how I build out the Echelon Reference Series.
Truly, I can’t imagine this would be even a mild surprise to anyone that I’m a nerd at times. But this goes a little beyond the norm, even for me. I just spent that last few hours drafting — rough cut, first draft — documentation of my XML Workflow. Don’t …
… sure, I’ll call it ‘two days’. I was going to say it was actually last night, but since the ‘October 2’ on the previous post was very early in the morning (AKA ‘quite late October 1’) I’ll call it two days. Makefile refactoring is complete. 500 lines of Perl …
Sometimes, “what it is” can be much more complicated that “how to work with it”. My publishing workflow has seven different systems (including a ‘nosys’) with thirteen different domains (collections of content with that system). The pf1 set is the only one I’ve published, the rest have been captured for …
No real change to the workflow, but in rebuilding my Makefile construction I found I’d missed a step, and misrepresented a couple of relationships.
The only constant we have is change. There was a major change to how I represent data in my workflow. Overall this is a good thing: it gives me more flexibility in what I can capture and model cleanly, it lets me more precisely match things when I’m searching, and …
Over the last year I’ve been reworking my data engine, and I’ve reached a point where it’s actually useful again. It’s not finished, but I am least up to the point of being able to identify object prerequisites and search for objects in text (such as feat names). One of …
I’ve been on something of a hiatus for the last little while. I work in the social sector — the part of the provincial government that provides more or less direct support to vulnerable citizens — and the last couple years put unprecedented demand on us. It’s been tiring. In …
Uniquely identifying objects is one of the more vexing activities in building the Echelon Reference Series. It is good to have a human-readable ID (it’s a great kindness to the developer to be able to see that yes, a parsed link looks like it does refer to the correct item, …
Any time you build a nontrivial data model, you have to expect the original assumptions will be tested, and found wanting. You’re not going to get it right the first time. In fact, I’ve read design books — data modeling and software design — that advise the reader to be …
ANYWAY, over time my document workflow has changed a few times. Here’s the latest iteration, for those who wish a look into the mind of someone not quite right (and so I have a copy to remind myself how I’m doing this). Not three weeks after I wrote that, I …
